Do not refile with the same record. The denial and RFE are the best map of what to change.
Profile
Data scientist on W-2 with a prime vendor employer working for an end client. Master's degree in computer science, 10 publications, 250 or more citations, one patent application publication.
What was claimed
- Scholarly contributions (six journal articles, four conference papers, one patent application)
- Judging (five conference submissions)
- Recommendation letters (four, one dependent and three independent)
What happened
The first petition received an RFE accepting none of the claimed criteria and was then denied.
The applicant asked about realistic chances on refile, whether filing at a different service center changes outcomes, whether to use regular or premium processing, and what changed in cases that succeeded after a denial.
Lessons for evaluating your own case
Every notice is a list of what to fix. Use these as a checklist for your own evidence.
- Do not refile with the same record. The denial and RFE are the best map of what to change.
- Claim fewer criteria and prove them better. The first filing claimed three and none was accepted.
- Consider whether an employer chain (vendor and end client) obscures the applicant's own role and whether a different claim set fits better.
- Service center choice is an unproven lever. Plan for evidence quality, not the office.
- If EB-1A evidence is thin, compare EB-2 NIW before spending another filing.
See how your evidence maps to the criteria
Meritocrat's free assessment maps your evidence to EB-1A, EB-2 NIW and O-1 criteria and shows the gaps, using patterns from cases like this one.
Get your free assessment