Check legibility and completeness of every exhibit before filing. Several requests here trace to print quality and missing basics.
Profile
Finance professional in a niche capital-markets field. Nine letters, deals built through proprietary analysis, articles in newspapers in Europe and Asia, and a recent job change.
What was claimed
- Membership in a capital-markets association
- Published material
- Original contributions
- Scholarly articles
- Leading or critical role
- High salary
What happened
The RFE asked for letters on continued work and US benefit from current or prospective employers, and association bylaws showing membership criteria.
On published material, some exhibits were not legible, and the officer wanted evidence of intended audience and proof the pieces were about the applicant and the applicant's field of work.
On original contributions, the officer asked for patents, copyrights or trademarks to show originality, plus objective evidence of significance. For scholarly articles in public newspapers, the officer asked for evidence the work was intended for readers in the field and for circulation data.
On leading or critical role, employment verification letters were requested, and letters needed specific tasks and accomplishments. On salary, W-2s and pay stubs did not show location, so the officer asked for comparative data for similar roles in similar locations.
Lessons for evaluating your own case
Every notice is a list of what to fix. Use these as a checklist for your own evidence.
- Check legibility and completeness of every exhibit before filing. Several requests here trace to print quality and missing basics.
- Include an employment verification letter for every role you rely on, with title, dates and duties.
- Salary evidence needs location and comparable-role data, not just pay records.
- For original contributions in a field without patents, show adoption: client contracts, third-party use, independent commentary.
- Newspaper pieces are rarely scholarly articles. Fit the evidence to the right criterion.
See how your evidence maps to the criteria
Meritocrat's free assessment maps your evidence to EB-1A, EB-2 NIW and O-1 criteria and shows the gaps, using patterns from cases like this one.
Get your free assessment