Skip to content

Analysis

Judging Must Align With Your Core Expertise

Podcast Episode 12 USCIS determines whether the person has acted as the judge of the work of others in the same or an allied field of specification.

▶ Watch the video on Immigration Merit Lab

USCIS determines whether the person has acted as the judge of the work of others in the same or an allied field of specification.

Examples of judging the work of others may include, but are not limited to:

  • Peer reviewing for a scholarly journal, as evidenced by a request from the journal to the person to do the review, accompanied by proof that the review was actually completed;

  • Peer review of abstracts or papers submitted for presentation at scholarly conferences in the respective field;

  • Serving as a member of a Ph.D. dissertation committee that makes the final judgment as to whether a candidate’s body of work satisfies the requirements for a doctoral degree, as evidenced by departmental records; and

  • Peer reviewer for government research funding programs.

Considerations:

The petitioner must show that the person has not only been invited to judge the work of others, but also that the person actually participated in the judging of the work of others in the same or allied field of specialization. For example, a petitioner might document the person’s peer review work by submitting a copy of a request from a journal to the person to do the review, accompanied by evidence confirming that the person actually completed the review.

This article is general information, not legal advice. Meritocrat is a preparation tool, not a law firm, and does not replace qualified legal counsel.

Prepare your case in one connected workspace

Case Studio helps EB-1A, EB-2 NIW, and O-1 applicants organize evidence and review what supports each claim.

Start Your Case Watch the Demo